Regardless of your opinions about the rights or wrongs of the capitalist system, it is the capitalists themselves that are behaving in an anti capitalist manner. Far more so than the so called anti capitalist protesters.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to rig markets and pretend that we are living in a free market system.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to save banks that are to big to fail.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to allow banks to become too big to fail.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to allow banks to create money out of thin air under the cover of the fractional reserve banking system.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to have a shadow banking system that is unregulated and causes other parts of the financial system to behave chaotically.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to have targeted import tariffs and limits.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to set artificially lower interest rates.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to deliberately allow inflation to take off in order to reduce the impact of commercial and sovereign debts.
It's ANTI CAPITALIST to effectively buy your own bonds through a convoluted system of central banks, shadow banks, monetary funds and rescue/stability funds.
Capitalism in its purest form could just work. The trading of goods and services equitably for other goods and services serve many barter only communities well.
Its time to think about just who the anti capitalists are.
Showing posts with label bankers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bankers. Show all posts
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
WHO ARE THE ANTI CAPITALISTS ? - And who are the bad guys ?
Labels:
austerity,
bankers,
crash,
debt,
depression,
hyperinflation,
inflation,
interest,
interest rates,
meltdown,
occupy LSX,
Occupy Wall Street,
protest
Monday, 17 October 2011
99ers UPDATE - Maybe they'll all get on a bus to occupy Wall Street and join in the fun
About a year ago I posted a blog about the 99ers in the USA. In a nutshell, in the USA, unemployment benefits only pay out for 26 weeks. Then you're on your own with no state support.
Because of the 2008 financial crisis and the huge increase in unemployment numbers, the American government passed an emergency law to increase these benefit payments by a further 73 weeks in order to limit the number of visible destitutes that would end up on the streets of U.S. cities.
That emergency legislation was only allowed to be passed on the basis of a concession to the political right. And that concession was that the new arrangement would be time limited. That time limit is about to expire.
To make matters worse, there is an election coming up soon so it is unlikely that this extension will be kept via a new version of that legislation.
Further details can be seen in my previous blog entry - http://subsister.blogspot.com/2010/12/99ers-set-to-take-off.html
Now then.
If that extension is not forthcoming by the end of this year (about 10 weeks time), the number of 99ers is set to increase on a rapid scale.
By February 2012, the number of new 99ers with no state support will increase by a staggering 2,153,700 people.

What will these 2 million new disenfranchised people decide to do about it?
Because of the 2008 financial crisis and the huge increase in unemployment numbers, the American government passed an emergency law to increase these benefit payments by a further 73 weeks in order to limit the number of visible destitutes that would end up on the streets of U.S. cities.
That emergency legislation was only allowed to be passed on the basis of a concession to the political right. And that concession was that the new arrangement would be time limited. That time limit is about to expire.
To make matters worse, there is an election coming up soon so it is unlikely that this extension will be kept via a new version of that legislation.
Further details can be seen in my previous blog entry - http://subsister.blogspot.com/2010/12/99ers-set-to-take-off.html
Now then.
If that extension is not forthcoming by the end of this year (about 10 weeks time), the number of 99ers is set to increase on a rapid scale.
By February 2012, the number of new 99ers with no state support will increase by a staggering 2,153,700 people.

What will these 2 million new disenfranchised people decide to do about it?
Labels:
austerity,
bankers,
crash,
depression,
food stamps,
government,
meltdown,
Occupy Wall Street,
protest,
revolution,
riots,
unemployment,
USA
Monday, 10 October 2011
QE2 - In other words, You are being conned again.
Last week, the UK government announced a second phase of quantitative easing. Or to give it it's real name "printing lots more digital money."
It was publicised by the Bank of England as a mechanism to kick start the UKs flagging economy. The idea was that this new money would trickle down from the central bank, to the investment banks, then to the high street banks, then to small businesses as loans and finally to facilitating new jobs and new wages.
What a load of bollocks.
This new money will never trickle down. The sum announced was £75 billion. That equates to about £1,300 for each person in the UK. That new money is yet another lot of new money that will have to be paid back at some future date by you and me.
My guess is that if you are lucky and the usual 90% to 10% rule applies, then you might see about £115 of that new money in your pocket over the next year or two. The other £1,200 will disappear much further up the food chain. It might even be used to save a bank from collapse or just be gambled to zero by hapless city traders.
The point is, the only way to get people spending again, is to put real cash directly into the pockets of real people. Most people (the 90%) have to spend all of their income on basic living expenses plus a few luxuries once in a while. If the new money were directed to the poorest 10%, that money would be spent in the blink of an eye and would continue sloshing around in the lower economy for some time. This would create demand, jobs and compounding VAT revenues.
Either the people at the top just don't get it, because they are so far removed from the realities of ordinary peoples daily lives or they are just plain evil and are pursuing a deliberate program of enslavement.
I'll leave you to decide.
It was publicised by the Bank of England as a mechanism to kick start the UKs flagging economy. The idea was that this new money would trickle down from the central bank, to the investment banks, then to the high street banks, then to small businesses as loans and finally to facilitating new jobs and new wages.
What a load of bollocks.
This new money will never trickle down. The sum announced was £75 billion. That equates to about £1,300 for each person in the UK. That new money is yet another lot of new money that will have to be paid back at some future date by you and me.
My guess is that if you are lucky and the usual 90% to 10% rule applies, then you might see about £115 of that new money in your pocket over the next year or two. The other £1,200 will disappear much further up the food chain. It might even be used to save a bank from collapse or just be gambled to zero by hapless city traders.
The point is, the only way to get people spending again, is to put real cash directly into the pockets of real people. Most people (the 90%) have to spend all of their income on basic living expenses plus a few luxuries once in a while. If the new money were directed to the poorest 10%, that money would be spent in the blink of an eye and would continue sloshing around in the lower economy for some time. This would create demand, jobs and compounding VAT revenues.
Either the people at the top just don't get it, because they are so far removed from the realities of ordinary peoples daily lives or they are just plain evil and are pursuing a deliberate program of enslavement.
I'll leave you to decide.
Labels:
bank of england,
bankers,
banks,
debt,
distribution,
gdp,
Occupy Wall Street,
printing money,
protest,
QE2,
quantitative easing,
slavery,
tax,
UK,
unemployment,
vat
Friday, 23 September 2011
DEBT, DEBT AND MORE DEBT - Your enslavement by numbers.
Here is a list of the top 20 countries in order of their debt to GDP ratios. I have also added a couple of columns showing the average wage in each country and the payback time required if we all worked full time and paid all of our earnings in tax.
Nearly all mainstream political and economic commentators have been making a big fuss about Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain (collectively known as the PIIGS).
Why this focus on these countries in particular. Is it a form of Northern European economic fascism?
Sure, Ireland is in big trouble. However there are some big players up there too. Why are they so quiet about UK, Switzerland, Holland, Sweden and even Germany to name a few.
Going back to the repayment terms, lets take the UK as an example.
George Osbournes austerity measures have caused an increase in tax take and a decrease in jobs and wages equivalent to about 6% (which is a lot for people to deal with). Therefore instead of the 3.34 years payback time the actual payback time is more like 55.7 years.
That 55 year target is coincidentaly the same period of time that people will have to work according the a recent independent actuarial audit on UK pensions. Mmmm! retirement at 73 years old.
The reason why the focus is not on the major Northern European countries is because the credit ratings agencies like Moody's, Fitch, Standard and Poors are in bed with their neo-con paymasters. Its just an illusion.
The war has started and it's almost over before we've even noticed.
Time to reset the clock. Abandon all forms of capitalism now.
The war has started and it's almost over before we've even noticed.
Time to reset the clock. Abandon all forms of capitalism now.
Monday, 19 September 2011
WHERE HAS ALL YOUR MONEY GONE ?
Just a quick graph showing 25 years of international economic growth and how the money has been distributed.
Who is stealing from who ?
Who is stealing from who ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



